Life
expectancy rates have always interested me. We read about Biblical
figures living well past 100, and yet most Europeans seem to have died
quite young. Part of these averages were brought down by the many women
who died in childbirth, and deadly diseases which swept through
villages, wiping out entire populations. But what eventually made the
difference in elevating longevity rates was, quite simply, hygiene.
In
medieval Europe, early Christian leaders declared bathing to be
non-spiritual. Fortunately, this belief was limited to small regions and
was short-lived. With the collapse of the Roman Empire, the popularity
and knowledge of bathing and sanitation were on the rise. (After all,
wasn't cleanliness next to godliness?) During the "Dark Ages" primitive
soap making became an established trade. And the Roman baths and unique
aqua duct systems were legendary.
Across the pond, many of the
British royalty were known for their not-so-healthy lifestyles, which
might include wearing the same clothes for months on end, and even
sleeping in them. (No wonder leprosy was so rampant.) It is noted that
King James VI of Scotland, who reigned during the mid-sixteenth century,
was famous for wearing the same hat until it literally fell apart. And
word was that he never bathed, believing it was bad for his health.
(Pity poor Mrs. James VI.) Early Americans slept with closed windows at
night, believing that disease drifted in on the night air. Ignorance of
germs and cleanliness contributed greatly to poor health, especially
tuberculosis and smallpox.
In the mid-nineteenth century, a very
observant physician theorized that women who were assisted by medical
students during childbirth had a high likelihood of dying. His theory
proved accurate when the students were required to wash their hands
prior to midwifery. After just a few months, death rates dropped
dramatically. It seems many of the med students came to assist births
directly from performing autopsies. With the discovery of bacteria, hand
washing took on a new importance and helped reduce the spread of germs
and viruses.
About the same time in England, cholera epidemics
were raging. A Dr. John Snow believed that cholera was spread primarily
via contaminated water, brought on by lack of sanitation and sewage
disposal. A few improvements in his part of London had dramatic results,
and happily the epidemics soon departed. Other cities began to follow
suit, and disease in highly populated areas declined significantly.
Amusingly,
the first flushing toilet is attributed to the appropriately named
Thomas Crapper in 1861. While his involvement in the invention is often
debated, he clearly understood the mechanics and made significant
contributions to the modern septic tank system, which pumped dirty water
out of buildings and sent it on its way. This vastly improved the
primitive sewage and waste systems (or lack of) in London, which set a
precedent for other cities with similar problems, along with reducing
the need for chamber pots.
In the 1920's, the introduction of a
disinfectant named Lysol was incredibly first sold as a genital cleanser
for women and possible birth control device (don't even go there).
Lysol advertised a list of benefits for every female need and was
actually used for such purposes until 1960. The fact that Lysol was and
remains a caustic poison which can cause skin burns and intense itching
apparently didn't deter women from applying it to their skin, not to
mention delicate tissues. Nor did it deter the advertisers from
promoting it for gynecological purposes for over 30 years. Fortunately,
now it is (hopefully) limited to household and commercial cleaning.
Ouch.
It is almost inconceivable to imagine life without our
modern conveniences and cleanliness standards. The things we take for
granted, like hot and cold running water, washing machines and daily
bathing, are only recent inventions. From the caveman up until the
twentieth century, hygiene was pretty much absent in most people's
lives. Happily, we now honor its importance. Long life, my fellow
Americans.
https://myportfolio.ac.nz/user/clarinda-sauer/hotelrichard
http://www.icsi.edu/capitalmarketweek/UserProfile/tabid/4706/userId/2768263/Default.aspx
http://jobboard.herzing.edu/company/2025/
https://netplusadmdev0.internet2.edu/community/index.php?p=/discussion/18680/hotelrichard
http://jobs.millennium.edu/user-9991.html
http://ajanco.sites.haverford.edu/wiki/User:Lleratnic
http://caelt3.harrisburgu.edu/studiowiki/index.php/User:Lleratnic
https://community.bus.emory.edu/dept/ISOM/GoGreen/Lists/Test%20Discussion%20Board/DispForm.aspx?ID=349
https://jmars.mars.asu.edu/forum/member.php?1300
http://journals.gonzaga.edu/index.php/gulawreview/comment/view/120/0/68783
http://climateapps2.oerc.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/team_display.php?teamid=13412
http://volunteer.cs.und.edu/csg/team_display.php?teamid=126595
https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/team_display.php?teamid=84953
https://cs.byu.edu/job-posting/hotelrichard
http://www.lssc.edu/about/Lists/ContactUs/DispForm.aspx?ID=194
https://xxm.times.uh.edu/forums/users/lleratnic
http://music.yale.edu/forums/users/lleratnic/
https://vue-forums.uit.tufts.edu/user/profile/612164.page
http://languagebox.ac.uk/4405/
http://humbox.ac.uk/5451/
No comments:
Post a Comment